The frequent tariff policy changes — where duties are imposed, paused and escalated in rapid succession — are creating confusion in the marketplace and complicating investment decisions for distillery leaders. As trade deals are negotiated and there is more certainty over time, companies in the industry should have a plan in place on how to respond and operate in this new environment.
TRADING CONDITIONS CONTINUE TO SHIFT
Trading conditions have turned volatile in 2025 for both American and global leaders operating in the spirits and beverage alcohol industry. The beginning of the year was marked by new U.S. tariffs and retaliatory actions from key trading partners.
The U.S. administration justified its tariff actions, citing it would address persistent trade deficits, protect national security, promote domestic manufacturing, combat illicit drug flows and achieve "fair and reciprocal" trade.
In response, the EU threatened, among other measures, to impose significant duties on American whiskey, specifically targeting constituent voter geographies for the current administration. The EU ultimately removed this from its final retaliatory list in April 2025. However, future retaliatory action by the EU may again include the imposition of tariffs against specific U.S. made distilled products.
KEY TARIFF RATES
As of mid-April 2025, the effective key tariff rates include a U.S. baseline 10% duty on most imports (excluding Canada and Mexico). U.S. imports from China faced complex, stacked tariffs reaching at least 145%, which have since been suspended for 90 days to a 10% baseline rate on most goods, plus a 20% International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariff. Imports of goods from Canada and Mexico compliant with the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), including most alcoholic beverages, remained exempt.
In response to U.S. imposed tariff rates, Canada enforced a 25% tariff on U.S. spirits, wine and beer, alongside provincial delistings in some instances. China also levied a 125% tariff on U.S. goods, which has been lowered to 10% during the 90-day suspension period. The U.K. maintained its zero-tariff stance on American whiskey, which was established in 2022. This did not change in the U.S.-U.K. trade deal, as of May 2025.
HISTORICAL IMPACT OF U.S. TARIFFS
Trade disputes have historically had a damaging effect on the industry, as well as on U.S. exports of spirits and alcoholic beverages. From 2018 to 2021, a 25% tariff was imposed on U.S. whiskey imports to the EU, which caused significant declines in U.S. spirits exports. Once the tariffs were suspended in 2022, U.S. whiskey exports to the EU increased significantly, leading to record overall exports of American-made whiskey in 2024.
ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND COUNTERMEASURES
The threat of tariffs and countermeasures have generated significant economic repercussions for the U.S. spirits and alcoholic beverage industry this year. The industry has seen effects on export performance, domestic market dynamics, supply chain costs, employment and consumer prices.
Production costs for U.S. exporters will increase as well, given tariffs on raw materials like aluminum and steel.
The beverage alcohol industry is also facing non-tariff barriers (NTBs), including increased regulations and discriminatory excise taxes. This provides additional challenges in accessing consumer markets abroad.
The table below illustrates existing NTBs affecting U.S. producers:
| Feature | European Union | China | United Kingdom |
| Labeling Requirements | Complex EU-specific rules (metric units, ABV format, allergens, lot numbers). Pending rules on nutrition/ingredients/health warnings (Beating Cancer Plan). Ireland's specific law sets precedent. | Mandatory pre-import Chinese labels. Specific content/format rules (net volume, warnings, origin). Potential for inconsistency. | Post-Brexit potential for divergence from EU rules. Requires UK-specific compliance. |
| Customs Procedures/ Inspections | Advance data required (ICS2). Use of T1/T2 documents. Potential delays from errors/inspections. | Complex clearance (CIQ/GAC). Potential for delays, sampling. High risk of opaque/unofficial barriers (arbitrary inspections, hurdles). | Reintroduced customs declarations post-Brexit. Potential for delays compared to single market era. |
| Licensing/ Certification | Standard EU import requirements. | Challenging import licensing (food license, etc.). Lack of transparency, inconsistency concerns. Mandatory Health/Origin/Authenticity certifications. | Standard UK import requirements. |
| Discriminatory Taxes/Markups | Preferential excise rates for domestic producers in some Member States (e.g., Austria, France, Greece, Spain). | Potential for discriminatory VAT application or internal taxes. | Less prevalent post-Brexit but potential exists. |
| Regulatory Standards | Packaging rules (PPWD revisions). Potential for differing technical requirements. | Potential for unique technical standards or testing requirements. | Post-Brexit potential for divergence from EU standards. |
| Unofficial/ Opaque Barriers | Generally lower risk compared to China but bureaucratic hurdles possible. | Significant documented historical use of unofficial barriers (inspections, admin hurdles), especially impacting non-state firms. High uncertainty. | Low risk currently indicated. |
OUTLOOK AND WHAT’S NEXT
The escalating trade tensions are significantly impacting the industry and have solicited strong reactions from industry stakeholders and advocacy groups across the globe. But while the current uncertainty persists, it is important for companies in the industry to assess their supply chains and estimate the impact of the current trade dispute on their production cost, profit margin and consumer pricing.
To the extent a company is dependent on inputs from a globally integrated supply chain, it may be necessary to evaluate alternate sources for certain inputs. Depending on the valuation method used, there may be opportunities to reexamine how the customs value is determined and to ensure that the correct duty rates are applied to each imported product. For distributors, taking advantage of bonded warehouses or foreign trade zones can help manage the cash impact of tariffs upon import and exclude products intended for re-export more effectively.
The near-term outlook remains highly uncertain and dependent on political negotiations. Key dates loom, including the scheduled expiration of the 90-day U.S. pause on higher reciprocal tariffs (excluding China) on July 9, 2025, the EU's corresponding pause ending July 14, 2025, and the expiration of the suspension of reciprocal tariffs with China in the middle of August. Failure to reach agreements could see these tariffs reactivated.
Industry business owners and executives whose companies engage in cross-border trade must monitor developments closely, as tariff policies and rates may shift significantly over the next few months. While trade agreements are being negotiated, the industry enjoys a temporary reprieve. However, considerable uncertainty remains over the medium term. Staying informed about developments in this area will help business leaders in the industry make informed, long-term, strategic decisions and effectively manage risks for their companies.
This article originally appeared in the American Distilling Institute's Distiller Magazine.
